Photo
pantslessprogressive:

Wall Street, the real victims
This Bloomberg article by Max Abelson is bursting at the seams with outrageous quotes from high-profile Wall Street executives responding to attacks on the wealthiest 1%:
“Who gives a crap about some imbecile? Are you kidding me?” - Bernard Marcus, Home Depot co-founder, on Occupy protesters
“It still feels lonely, but the chorus is definitely increased.” - John Allison, BB&T Corp. director
“Instead of an attack on the 1 percent, let’s call it an attack on the very productive.” - John Allison
“I am a fat cat, I’m not ashamed. If you mean by fat cat that I’ve succeeded, yeah, then I’m a fat cat. I stand guilty of being a fat cat.” - Ken Langone, Home Depot co-founder
“You have to have skin in the game. I’m not saying how much people should do. But we should all be part of the system.” - Stephen Schwarzman, Blackstone CEO, on low-income households not paying income taxes
“If I hear a politician use the term ‘paying your fair share’ one more time, I’m going to vomit.” - Tom Golisano, billionaire and founder of Paychex
And my absolute favorite…
“You’ll get more out of me if you treat me with respect.” - Leon Cooperman, billionaire and former CEO of Goldman Sachs’s money-management unit

pantslessprogressive:

Wall Street, the real victims

This Bloomberg article by Max Abelson is bursting at the seams with outrageous quotes from high-profile Wall Street executives responding to attacks on the wealthiest 1%:

  • “Who gives a crap about some imbecile? Are you kidding me?” - Bernard Marcus, Home Depot co-founder, on Occupy protesters
  • “It still feels lonely, but the chorus is definitely increased.” - John Allison, BB&T Corp. director
  • “Instead of an attack on the 1 percent, let’s call it an attack on the very productive.” - John Allison
  • “I am a fat cat, I’m not ashamed. If you mean by fat cat that I’ve succeeded, yeah, then I’m a fat cat. I stand guilty of being a fat cat.” - Ken Langone, Home Depot co-founder
  • “You have to have skin in the game. I’m not saying how much people should do. But we should all be part of the system.” - Stephen Schwarzman, Blackstone CEO, on low-income households not paying income taxes
  • “If I hear a politician use the term ‘paying your fair share’ one more time, I’m going to vomit.” - Tom Golisano, billionaire and founder of Paychex

And my absolute favorite…

  1. “You’ll get more out of me if you treat me with respect.” - Leon Cooperman, billionaire and former CEO of Goldman Sachs’s money-management unit
Photo

Over the last quarter-century, the vast majority (81.7 percent) of  increases to wealth have gone to the wealthiest 5 percent, while those  in the middle saw declines in their wealth.

—11 Telling Charts about 2011

Over the last quarter-century, the vast majority (81.7 percent) of increases to wealth have gone to the wealthiest 5 percent, while those in the middle saw declines in their wealth.

—11 Telling Charts about 2011

Text

Thirteen Observations made by Lemony Snicket while watching Occupy Wall Street from a Discreet Distance

4. People who say money doesn’t matter are like people who say cake doesn’t matter—it’s probably because they’ve already had a few slices.

6. Nobody wants to fall into a safety net, because it means the structure in which they’ve been living is in a state of collapse and they have no choice but to tumble downwards. However, it beats the alternative.

7. Someone feeling wronged is like someone feeling thirsty. Don’t tell them they aren’t. Sit with them and have a drink.

8. Don’t ask yourself if something is fair. Ask someone else—a stranger in the street, for example.

Read the rest here

Text

Alan Moore on the Occupy movement and “V”

Back in the early 80s, approaching the end of Vendetta’s epic 38-part cycle, Moore was struggling to think of another “V” word with which to title a closing chapter. He’d already used Victims, Vaudeville and Vengeance; the Villain, the Voice, the Vanishing; even Vicissitude and Verwirrung (the German word for confusion). “I was getting pretty desperate,” he says.

He eventually settled on Vox populi. “Voice of the people. And I think that if the mask stands for anything, in the current context, that is what it stands for. This is the people. That mysterious entity that is evoked so often – this is the people.”

Read More

I think Moore nails it when he discusses the Occupy movement’s use of the Guy Fawkes mask as a means of creating spectacle more than anything else. Making fun of the protesters for wearing the ‘face’ of a theocratic terrorist sort of misses the point.

There are more interesting points to make about the mask: how collectivity and anonymity have become a sort of refuge and protest against the corporatization of identity (e.g. social media); how the mask ironically reveals the face of the ‘average’ OWS protester as white and male; the resemblance of the Fawkes mask to commedia dell’arte masks in that it can be “pleasant, breezy, or more sinister”, depending on the context; the interesting choice of leftist protesters to wear these masks rather than the bandanas and hoodies popular among anarchists in the ’90s—perhaps we always find a face more sympathetic, even if it’s not a real one; etc.

V for Vendetta by Alan Moore and David Lloyd

Protesters at Occupy Hong Kong

Camped out at Occupy London

Zuccotti Park, New York, 10 October 2011 (Andrew Burton/Associated Press)

Shepherd Fairey “Occupy Hope”

Photo
think-progress:

The 2012 federal discretionary budget: Military gets the lion’s share of spending, while social priorities fall by the wayside.

(Also, whoever does Occupy graphics is sheer awesomeness.)

think-progress:

The 2012 federal discretionary budget: Military gets the lion’s share of spending, while social priorities fall by the wayside.

(Also, whoever does Occupy graphics is sheer awesomeness.)

Photo
whineandbeer:

uncleclark:

OCCUPY WALLSTREET - POSTER

This is gorgeous.

whineandbeer:

uncleclark:

OCCUPY WALLSTREET - POSTER

This is gorgeous.

(Source: manelof, via novazembla)

Link

wilwheaton:

Glenn Greenwald:

The intent and effect of such abuse is that it renders those guaranteed freedoms meaningless. If a population becomes bullied or intimidated out of exercising rights offered on paper, those rights effectively cease to exist. Every time the citizenry watches peaceful protesters getting pepper-sprayed — or hears that an Occupy protester suffered brain damage and almost died after being shot in the skull with a rubber bullet — many become increasingly fearful of participating in this citizen movement, and also become fearful in general of exercising their rights in a way that is bothersome or threatening to those in power. That’s a natural response, and it’s exactly what the climate of fear imposed by all abusive police state actions is intended to achieve: to coerce citizens to “decide” on their own to be passive and compliant — to refrain from exercising their rights — out of fear of what will happen if they don’t.

The genius of this approach is how insidious its effects are: because the rights continue to be offered on paper, the citizenry continues to believe it is free. They believe that they are free to do everything they choose to do, because they have been “persuaded” — through fear and intimidation — to passively accept the status quo. As Rosa Luxemburg so perfectly put it: “Those who do not move, do not notice their chains.” Someone who sits at home and never protests or effectively challenges power factions will not realize that their rights of speech and assembly have been effectively eroded because they never seek to exercise those rights; it’s only when we see steadfast, courageous resistance from the likes of these UC-Davis students is this erosion of rights manifest.

Quote
"

Today you ordered police onto our campus to clear student protesters from the quad. These were protesters who participated in a rally speaking out against tuition increases and police brutality on UC campuses on Tuesday—a rally that I organized, and which was endorsed by the Davis Faculty Association. These students attended that rally in response to a call for solidarity from students and faculty who were bludgeoned with batons, hospitalized, and arrested at UC Berkeley last week. In the highest tradition of non-violent civil disobedience, those protesters had linked arms and held their ground in defense of tents they set up beside Sproul Hall. In a gesture of solidarity with those students and faculty, and in solidarity with the national Occupy movement, students at UC Davis set up tents on the main quad. When you ordered police outfitted with riot helmets, brandishing batons and teargas guns to remove their tents today, those students sat down on the ground in a circle and linked arms to protect them.

What happened next?

Without any provocation whatsoever, other than the bodies of these students sitting where they were on the ground, with their arms linked, police pepper-sprayed students. Students remained on the ground, now writhing in pain, with their arms linked.

What happened next?

Police used batons to try to push the students apart. Those they could separate, they arrested, kneeling on their bodies and pushing their heads into the ground. Those they could not separate, they pepper-sprayed directly in the face, holding these students as they did so. When students covered their eyes with their clothing, police forced open their mouths and pepper-sprayed down their throats. Several of these students were hospitalized. Others are seriously injured. One of them, forty-five minutes after being pepper-sprayed down his throat, was still coughing up blood.

This is what happened. You are responsible for it.

"

— Nathan Brown, Assistant Professor Department of English at UC Davis (via chemicalburned)

(Source: bicyclebarricade.wordpress.com, via bowiecadmium)

Photo
The ten stupidest objections to the Occupy movement

The ten stupidest objections to the Occupy movement

Link

landoflooniton:

pileofmonkeys:

I am going to lose my shit.

A) McDonald’s is not always hiring.

B) A part-time, no-benefits job is not going to help anyone climb out of financial ruin.

C) IT’S NOT ABOUT LAZINESS. THERE ARE NO JOBS.

I want to see these smug shits get laid off from their cushy long-time…

a)  just look and trust me, you’ll find something, somewhere

b) something is better than nothing. and if you show initiative and desire; you might actually go somewhere in the company you’re working in.

c) isn’t this called the Land of Opportunity for a reason?

I’m not going to call these people lazy; all the effort they’re putting in complaining, sitting down, and getting maced (sarcasm) shows they’ve got drive, and a desire to have more. But I checked and there’s plenty of Fortune 500 companies with room for advancement hiring across the country, why not try there?

I’m not even going to touch the first two responses, which are utter bullshit in a time of around 9% unemployment, the cost of living outstripping minimum wage, skyrocketing costs for healthcare and energy, and the continuing outsourcing and casualization of work.

Complacency and smugness I can sort of understand—some people just lack empathy and imagination. But the third point just made my jaw drop. How stupid can you get? North Korea is called the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, but we all know that the only accurate words in that name are “of Korea”. It seems landoflooniton never learned something that most of us figure out in elementary school.

(via circusofworldstruggle)