Link

menwomenandelectrodaggers:

downlo:

My alma mater made it!

Of course, the school was founded by the Society of Friends AKA Quakers.

I’m annoyed that they didn’t mention relevant things like: Customs, the Honor Code, the Social Honor Code, the extremely non-competitive atmosphere (talking about grades is against the Honor Code), the fact that everyone eats in the same dining hall, the smallness of the campus, and Pinwheel Day (on the first day of spring, pinwheels will appear on the lawn in front of Founders’ Hall).

Carlton has a house that’s open 24 hours a day that you can bake cookies in. Some old lady left it to the college with that as the stipulation. They also invented their own religion (Reformed Druids of North America) for a while when they tried to make going a religious service once a week a mandatory thing. 

I did not go there, but my cousin does and I had friends who did. None of them have ever been appropriately excited about said cookie house.

Cookie House? Best!

I’ve always dreamed about leaving my school a similarly quirky bequest. Like a scholarship for students who write the funniest essay (I judge). Or a small fund set aside specifically for faculty to buy Birkenstocks and socks.

Link

My alma mater made it!

Of course, the school was founded by the Society of Friends AKA Quakers.

I’m annoyed that they didn’t mention relevant things like: Customs, the Honor Code, the Social Honor Code, the extremely non-competitive atmosphere (talking about grades is against the Honor Code), the fact that everyone eats in the same dining hall, the smallness of the campus, and Pinwheel Day (on the first day of spring, pinwheels will appear on the lawn in front of Founders’ Hall).

Link

University of Chicago? Really?

Link

In a new study published in The Journal of Applied Social Psychology, psychologists Kristin J. Anderson and Melinda Kanner explored undergraduate students’ evaluations of lesbian, gay, and heterosexual professors of a hypothetical course, Psychology of Human Sexuality.  They provided students with a syllabus of the course, providing biographical information about the hypothetical professor including political ideology, gender, and sexual identity.  The researchers also varied whether the syllabus had typographical errors.  They examined whether students would differ in their evaluations of the lesbian/gay and heterosexual professors, especially in terms of whether the professor was politically biased.

The researchers found that lesbian and gay professors were viewed as politically biased, while heterosexual professors with the exact same syllabus were viewed as objective.  On average, lesbian/gay professors were rated more harshly, and students pointed to political bias and typographical errors (typos) on the syllabus as their main reason for the negative evaluation.  However, heterosexual professors were not negatively evaluated for political bias and typographical errors.

The findings of this study are similar to past research that has already indicated that professors who are women and racial and ethnic minorities are rated more harshly by students and often presumed to be biased.  White heterosexual men, on the other hand, are presumed to be objective and unbiased, and they are less likely to be challenged by students.  Whereas students’ evaluations of professors are used to make hiring and promotion decisions for professors, students’ relatively harsh evaluations of minority professors (including women, people of color, and sexual minorities) can unfairly hurt the careers of these groups of professors…

(via)

Link

Mandated by the Higher Education Opportunity Act (HEOA), the College Affordability and Transparency Center is a federal website that gives students, educators, and policymakers information about college tuition and costs. The lists are generated using data collected by the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (via)

Click through to find out the answers to questions like:

Which colleges have the highest and lowest tuition?

How much do career and vocational schools cost?

How fast are college costs rising?

Text

I’m so sick of the lie that only minorities get grants and scholarships

I’m Asian and we’re statistically over-represented in higher education (so much so that we’re basically discriminated against by college admissions boards who are afraid of white people not being the majority anymore…but that’s another story). So we’re sorta, kinda in the same boat as white people as far as not being heavily recruited by colleges.

Yet I still got plenty of grants and scholarships because my family was too poor to pay the full tuition and other costs. If you’re a decent student and your family’s income qualifies you for financial aid, then you’ll get it…particularly if you attend a school with a need-blind admissions policy and generous student aid fund.

I knew poor white kids at my alma mater who basically received full rides. How the hell do racist whiners explain that?

But they had to go looking for the money. It doesn’t come and find you. If you stop bitching for a minute about minorities stealing the resources that you supposedly deserve and actually put the work into filling out those FAFSA and scholarship applications, then you can get funding for college too.

P.S. Only certain white people seem to think that they have automatic dibs on admissions to their college of choice. No, that black/Latin/Native person did not take “your” spot—that spot never fucking belonged to you in the first place.

Photo
msavignon:

Amazon Reveals Most Well-Read Cities in U.S. calculated according to book, magazine, and newspaper sales (both print and Kindle formats).

Unsurprisingly, there are large universities (or many colleges) in all of these places. I’m kind of surprised Philly isn’t on there, though.

msavignon:

Amazon Reveals Most Well-Read Cities in U.S. calculated according to book, magazine, and newspaper sales (both print and Kindle formats).

Unsurprisingly, there are large universities (or many colleges) in all of these places. I’m kind of surprised Philly isn’t on there, though.

Photo
so-treu:


Morehouse College graduation, 2011.

you know, with all this talk of the crisis in higher education there’s a lot of commentary going around that doesn’t take into account how much graduating from college means to a shit ton of people, esp POC & working class folks. i feel like i keep reading articles written by white dudes that are like, fuck college it’s totally not worth it! tell that to a population whose unemployment rate isn’t double that of whites, in a world college degrees (supposedly) earns you a greater degree of economic stability and advancement.

Getting a college degree is one of the best ways to change your class and expand your opportunities. I’m not putting down anyone who doesn’t go to college, but not having a bachelors is a default for many underprivileged folks rather than a free choice. It’s a perfectly valid decision to skip college, but don’t assume a college education is worthless for everyone else too.

so-treu:

Morehouse College graduation, 2011.

you know, with all this talk of the crisis in higher education there’s a lot of commentary going around that doesn’t take into account how much graduating from college means to a shit ton of people, esp POC & working class folks. i feel like i keep reading articles written by white dudes that are like, fuck college it’s totally not worth it! tell that to a population whose unemployment rate isn’t double that of whites, in a world college degrees (supposedly) earns you a greater degree of economic stability and advancement.

Getting a college degree is one of the best ways to change your class and expand your opportunities. I’m not putting down anyone who doesn’t go to college, but not having a bachelors is a default for many underprivileged folks rather than a free choice. It’s a perfectly valid decision to skip college, but don’t assume a college education is worthless for everyone else too.

(via espritfollet)

Quote
"…as Mr Beck himself says, he simply didn’t learn very much about history or political science in school, and just began reading on his own a few years ago. If you try to teach yourself history and political science from scratch, you’re likely to draw a lot of shallow and inaccurate conclusions, particularly when you’re the sort of person who’s predisposed to seeing things in terms of white hats and black hats. One role of instructors, particularly at the college level, is to smack down the sweeping generalisations and facile analogies their students tend to make, and try to force them to adopt more rigorous and complicated approaches. But what if you’re surrounded by people who reward you handsomely for making sweeping, slanderous generalisations, both because it delivers ratings and because it’s ideologically helpful?"

A good piece from The Economist about Glenn Beck’s constant invocations of Nazism and Hitler. The quoted passage in particular stood out to me.

Just think about it, folks: If Beck had gotten a liberal arts degree way back when, then we might not be hearing him rant about Nazis and socialism today. He might be quoting Ayn Rand instead.

(via theeconomist)

Photo
fucknojezebel:

I don’t think people who think like this belong in an academic atmosphere.

I didn’t read the post associated with this comment, and I usually disagree with this particular commenter. S/he generally says ridiculously privileged BS. But as someone who works with college students, I have to agree with one aspect of this comment.
There ARE lots of kids who are in college these days who are not cut out for it.** (I’m speaking strictly as someone who’s teaching kids who are going for a liberal arts degree.) They’re here because it’s expected of people (particularly those of a certain class) after high school. That’s not to say they’re stupid or lazy or don’t deserve a college education, but they aren’t all going to be interested in or good at reading and analyzing serious scholarship or writing papers.
I can’t pitch a baseball, sing an aria, or program a computer. I could learn how to do those things, but I won’t be nearly as good as some people. It’ll be harder for me and I’ll struggle more than someone who is athletic, or who has a good set of pipes, or who has been tinkering with computers all her life because they fascinate her. Same goes for reading philosophy or analyzing poetry. Some people will struggle more, need more help and training, and still not do as well as others. People are willing to acknowledge that pitching a baseball is a specialized skill that not everyone will be good at it, no matter how hard they try, but they’re not willing to say the same thing about scholarship.
So it’s possible that being in an environment where you’re expected to do things that might not come easily to you and which might not even interest you that much just might be stressful. Failing repeatedly at tasks that your classmates seem to perform easily might be anxiety-inducing. Knowing that you’re accumulating a huge amount of debt while doing so might also be a source of stress. That’s aside from the fact that more people in general are diagnosed with mental illnesses and conditions these days due to higher awareness and less stigma. Even so, the stressors I mentioned above probably aren’t going to helpful for someone already struggling with depression, social anxiety, etc.
**I do realize that a college degree is nowadays an essential key to social mobility and that many jobs (unnecessarily) require a BA.

fucknojezebel:

I don’t think people who think like this belong in an academic atmosphere.

I didn’t read the post associated with this comment, and I usually disagree with this particular commenter. S/he generally says ridiculously privileged BS. But as someone who works with college students, I have to agree with one aspect of this comment.

There ARE lots of kids who are in college these days who are not cut out for it.** (I’m speaking strictly as someone who’s teaching kids who are going for a liberal arts degree.) They’re here because it’s expected of people (particularly those of a certain class) after high school. That’s not to say they’re stupid or lazy or don’t deserve a college education, but they aren’t all going to be interested in or good at reading and analyzing serious scholarship or writing papers.

I can’t pitch a baseball, sing an aria, or program a computer. I could learn how to do those things, but I won’t be nearly as good as some people. It’ll be harder for me and I’ll struggle more than someone who is athletic, or who has a good set of pipes, or who has been tinkering with computers all her life because they fascinate her. Same goes for reading philosophy or analyzing poetry. Some people will struggle more, need more help and training, and still not do as well as others. People are willing to acknowledge that pitching a baseball is a specialized skill that not everyone will be good at it, no matter how hard they try, but they’re not willing to say the same thing about scholarship.

So it’s possible that being in an environment where you’re expected to do things that might not come easily to you and which might not even interest you that much just might be stressful. Failing repeatedly at tasks that your classmates seem to perform easily might be anxiety-inducing. Knowing that you’re accumulating a huge amount of debt while doing so might also be a source of stress. That’s aside from the fact that more people in general are diagnosed with mental illnesses and conditions these days due to higher awareness and less stigma. Even so, the stressors I mentioned above probably aren’t going to helpful for someone already struggling with depression, social anxiety, etc.

**I do realize that a college degree is nowadays an essential key to social mobility and that many jobs (unnecessarily) require a BA.