Link

discoverynews:

mentalflossr:

Unlike the sheets, hotels and motels do not change or launder the bedspreads on a daily basis. And if you don’t think there are various bodily fluids lingering in those coverings, let us remind you that when the bedspread from an internationally rated five-star hotel was introduced as evidence in…

#2 Purse Bottoms!

Nothing will convince me that public toilet seats are OK. Though now I have a bunch of new things to be grossed out by:

Unlike the sheets, hotels and motels do not change or launder the bedspreads on a daily basis. It’s actually more of an annual thing. And if you don’t think there are various bodily fluids lingering in those coverings, let us remind you that when the bedspread from an internationally ranked five-star hotel was introduced as evidence in boxer Mike Tyson’s rape trial, investigators found it coated with the DNA of so many different men that it took some significant time to finally isolate traces of Tyson’s contribution.

Link

Giancarlo Esposito will be answering questions in a Reddit AMA, starting at 2:30. (The thread is already huge!)

(image credit)

Text

On Missing e: Here’s what one blogger sent Tumblr

shortformblog:

wistfuldreamer:

Because Missing-e is connected to your browser - not your account. I only have M-e installed on Chrome. So as a test I logged on using IE, Safari and Firefox. And I still had the message telling me to ‘uninstall’ M-e. Yet my second account, which I’ve only ever used on FF, and is not connected to my email address, does not have the message at all.

According to Tumblrs privacy policy, they should not be able to access ‘users information regarding (…) extensions or third party software’. Clearly though, they have. So I think the REAL privacy problem is the fact that somehow tumblr staff are obtaining this information, which they should not be able to access, and are targeting users.

Never mind the fact that I didn’t even have Missing-E INSTALLED on three browsers, and yet the message still popped up on all of them - even after closing it again - is proof of this. 

Sort your shit out tumblr

Thanks to Maurice Cherry for bringing this to our attention.

(via glossylalia)

Link

I’m pretty sure there are quite a few things on this list that were known before last year or just wrong. But it’s still an interesting read. My favorite items:

26. The word “loo” dates from medieval times, thought to have derived from the warning shout of “gardez l’eau!” given by those tipping chamber pots out the window.
More details

29. Dogs watch how nice people are to others to work out whom to approach to beg for food.

More details (Daily Mail)

33. Transparent typewriters are sold to prisons, to avoid the risk of hidden contraband.
More details (The Daily Feed)

47. Sonic the Hedgehog’s shoes are based on Michael Jackson’s footwear in the Bad video.
More details

Link

Awkward phrasing, but I couldn’t think of anything better. Enough of my pedantry! These are interesting, particularly the tips about suppressing the urge to go to the bathroom and turning off your gag reflex.

Photo
kazoos:


Today at the museum my teacher pointed out that parents often requested that their deceased children would also be depicted when an artist made a portrait of their children. Often they would add a subtle sign that the child was deceased, in this case the girl is wearing a small skull and bones ring. 

kazoos:

Today at the museum my teacher pointed out that parents often requested that their deceased children would also be depicted when an artist made a portrait of their children. Often they would add a subtle sign that the child was deceased, in this case the girl is wearing a small skull and bones ring. 

(via wine-loving-vagabond)

Tags: painting fyi art
Photo
akindofterminus:

Back in 1884, a Swiss astronomer by the name of Arndt made headlines   when he claimed to have discovered a very curious planet in an orbit   beyond Neptune — a surprisingly cubical planet.
Of course even in 1884, everyone knew this was bunk. The New York Times even ran a piece titled “The Cubical Planet”  in their Nov. 16 edition. As informative as it is stuffy, the Gilded  Age article interviews  physicist Dr. Theodore Vankirk, who first  dismisses the prospect of a  square planet as pure hooey, and then  proceeds to wax scientific about  just what a cube world would be like. It all comes down to gravity.   On our spherical Earth, gravity pulls “down” us toward the planet’s   center of mass. So on a flat surface, we naturally stand up straight.
A  hypothetical cube world, however, would feature six square faces  and  you’d only encounter up/down gravity toward the centers of these   regions. As you traveled closer and closer to the edge, it would feel   like you were walking up an incline and it would be difficult to stand   up straight because the gravitational pull would draw you toward the   center of the massive cube, which wouldn’t lie directly beneath your   feet. Standing on the “edge” of this cube world would feel like standing   atop a mountain range. Contemporary cosmologist Karen L. Masters also finds the topic of cube worlds fascinating — especially the atmospheric possibilities. As she explains in Cornell’s Ask a Physicist feature, all six faces of the plant aces would boast temperate weather,   centralized bodies of water and none of them would feature polar or   equatorial weather.  What’s more, the pointy edges of the cube would   actually poke through the planet’s atmosphere like titanic mountains.   Here’s her explanation : Let’s assume that the  atmosphere goes up 1000 km above the Earth  (when it is a sphere), and so  is a sphere itself of radius  6400km+1000km=7400km. This should be about  the right number. A cube  with the same volume as the spherical Earth  would have a side 10,000 km  (6,400 miles) long so the corners are 8700  km from the center! They  would definitely stick out above the  atmosphere.

akindofterminus:

Back in 1884, a Swiss astronomer by the name of Arndt made headlines when he claimed to have discovered a very curious planet in an orbit beyond Neptune — a surprisingly cubical planet.

Of course even in 1884, everyone knew this was bunk. The New York Times even ran a piece titled “The Cubical Planet” in their Nov. 16 edition. As informative as it is stuffy, the Gilded Age article interviews physicist Dr. Theodore Vankirk, who first dismisses the prospect of a square planet as pure hooey, and then proceeds to wax scientific about just what a cube world would be like. It all comes down to gravity. On our spherical Earth, gravity pulls “down” us toward the planet’s center of mass. So on a flat surface, we naturally stand up straight.

A hypothetical cube world, however, would feature six square faces and you’d only encounter up/down gravity toward the centers of these regions. As you traveled closer and closer to the edge, it would feel like you were walking up an incline and it would be difficult to stand up straight because the gravitational pull would draw you toward the center of the massive cube, which wouldn’t lie directly beneath your feet. Standing on the “edge” of this cube world would feel like standing atop a mountain range. Contemporary cosmologist Karen L. Masters also finds the topic of cube worlds fascinating — especially the atmospheric possibilities. As she explains in Cornell’s Ask a Physicist feature, all six faces of the plant aces would boast temperate weather, centralized bodies of water and none of them would feature polar or equatorial weather.  What’s more, the pointy edges of the cube would actually poke through the planet’s atmosphere like titanic mountains. Here’s her explanation : Let’s assume that the atmosphere goes up 1000 km above the Earth (when it is a sphere), and so is a sphere itself of radius 6400km+1000km=7400km. This should be about the right number. A cube with the same volume as the spherical Earth would have a side 10,000 km (6,400 miles) long so the corners are 8700 km from the center! They would definitely stick out above the atmosphere.

Photo
curiositycounts:

A sobering visual guide to income distribution in the US, part of a larger infographic

curiositycounts:

A sobering visual guide to income distribution in the US, part of a larger infographic

Photo
think-progress:

The 2012 federal discretionary budget: Military gets the lion’s share of spending, while social priorities fall by the wayside.

(Also, whoever does Occupy graphics is sheer awesomeness.)

think-progress:

The 2012 federal discretionary budget: Military gets the lion’s share of spending, while social priorities fall by the wayside.

(Also, whoever does Occupy graphics is sheer awesomeness.)

Link