"Not only is America divided between two opposing principles, but a great many individuals are of those two minds at once: progressive on some matters, conservative on others — with all sorts of variations. They are called variously independents, moderates, or the center. They are mostly the population that elections depend on. They have not one fundamental principle, but are split between two. What makes one of these ascendant in the individual brain is the language one hears most. That is why the domination of public discourse is so important. It is why advertising in the media is important, why talk radio and tv and social media matter. Elections are what focus attention on public discourse. That is why the next step for the Occupy Movement should be to occupy elections. The way to begin any discussion should be: Do you care about your fellow citizens? If so, do you take responsibility to act on that care?"
— George Lakoff (via azspot)
(via azspot)
"
Oh, and let me give a special shout-out to “centrist” pundits who won’t admit that President Obama has already given them what they want. The dialogue seems to go like this. Pundit: “Why won’t the president come out for a mix of spending cuts and tax hikes?” Mr. Obama: “I support a mix of spending cuts and tax hikes.” Pundit: “Why won’t the president come out for a mix of spending cuts and tax hikes?”
You see, admitting that one side is willing to make concessions, while the other isn’t, would tarnish one’s centrist credentials. And the result is that the G.O.P. pays no price for refusing to give an inch.
"
— Paul Krugman on what counts as political ‘centrism’ these days
Current calls for “less government” actually mean less power for elected leaders and for the bureaucracies that serve them and more power for the “oligarchy” of millionaires and corporations. Such calls also imply less power for the people (the democratic element), since, while elected leaders are directly responsible to those who vote, those whose power is based on wealth are not. In fact, many of us who bristle at any government interference with our freedom and privacy, accept, as an economic necessity, similar interference from the companies we work for or do business with.
(Source: The New York Times)
One thing I found interesting when a bunch of right wingers ganged up on me on Twitter, screeching incoherent nonsense at me in response to this bit of satire, was how most of them assumed that I don’t pay federal income taxes. They coughed up the same crap about how those of us who support Occupy Wall St. are lazy parasites who don’t want to work, and are playing victim. And that we hate people who do work and pay taxes.
But of course I pay federal income taxes. I’m a 34-year-old woman who makes a middle class living. That I don’t throw a fit about it and act like it’s the greatest injustice in the world doesn’t mean I don’t pay federal income taxes. That’s because I’m a fucking grown-up. The ready assumption that everyone who pays federal income taxes is a big, screaming toddler about it is what probably galls me more than anything about the “53%” nonsense. Screeching about your taxes just makes me assume you are in a constant tantrum because of other things in life that are less than pleasant: that you have to work for a living, that food has calories, that not everyone you want will have sex with you….
But it is interesting how much [conservatives] project onto the left. Liberals are protesting real problems: unemployment, the foreclosure crisis, the war. And conservatives respond by saying, “Quit whining about real problems and listen to me whine about having to be a fucking grown-up. Wah!” And then say that liberals are “playing the victim”. It’s just one of the worst cases of projection I’ve seen in all the years I’ve spent observing right wing projection.
(My emphasis.) Feeling unjustifiably aggrieved for doing what you’re supposed to do anyway sums up the whole 53% thing pretty well.