1. When someone tells you that “they/them/their” is improper as a singular pronoun set…

    alexandraerin:

    gqid:

    Something interesting I learned in my speech class textbook, Reflect and Relate (Second Edition) about they/them/their in the English language, page 187:

    A language’s regulative rules also change. When you learned to speak
    and write English, for example, you probably were taught that they is inappropriate as a singular pronoun. But before the 1850s, people commonly used they as the singular pronoun for individuals whose gender was unknown—for example, “the owner went out to the stables, where they  fed the horses” (Spender, 1990).

    In 1850, male grammarians petitioned the British Parliament to pass a law declaring that all gender-indeterminate references be labeled he instead of they (Spender, 1990). Since that time, teachers of English worldwide have taught their students that they used as a singular pronoun is “not proper.”

    I always thought that “they” was considered grammatically improper as a singular pronoun because of the possibility of confusion with the plural “they” (an additional factor also explored in this paper). I wanted to see if their were other sources on the above and there are! I was interested to learn about this in particular because, time and time again, I’ve heard people rudely remark on they/them/their being “improper” after someone would mention this as the pronoun set they’d like people to use in reference to them - both online and off. They/them/their is also the pronoun set I have gelled with best in reference to myself. If anyone has more info on this, I’d love to know about it!

    All of this.

    Also, the notion that there’s ambiguity between singular and plural they is utterly exploded by the fact that we routinely use “you” as both singular and plural without any difficulty.

    And “you”, like “they”, originated as a plural pronoun.

     
    1. masquevivi reblogged this from qwertybard
    2. phobetor reblogged this from anomolisticbeauty
    3. anomolisticbeauty reblogged this from bohemianarthouse
    4. nieczynne reblogged this from bohemianarthouse
    5. glass-onion- reblogged this from bohemianarthouse
    6. bohemianarthouse reblogged this from downlo
    7. itsahullabaloo reblogged this from aesho
    8. cumberconundrum reblogged this from rainbowcatvomit
    9. anamikadevi reblogged this from ave-atque-vale
    10. ave-atque-vale reblogged this from alexandraerin
    11. storyinsilence reblogged this from theslavbarbarian
    12. xchailiax reblogged this from glompcat
    13. glompcat reblogged this from aesho
    14. warehouseagentinbelgium reblogged this from charmingbravardo
    15. charmingbravardo reblogged this from aesho
    16. aesho reblogged this from johnverbingalonewithnouns
    17. mxnotmrdarcy reblogged this from impromptuonedykedanceparty
    18. pepperlivesbehindthesea reblogged this from tehcrzy1
    19. tehcrzy1 reblogged this from tehcrzy1
    20. feministcrixus reblogged this from whoandwho
    21. stardust-ink reblogged this from illuminorti
    22. whoandwho reblogged this from illuminorti
    23. kaehikari reblogged this from illuminorti
    24. psychedelichocobo reblogged this from illuminorti and added:
      an ambiguous person - such as, “Imagine somebody going...shop. They buy a pizza.” If...
    25. illuminorti reblogged this from casual-isms
    26. ludovician8 reblogged this from msqueenly
    27. msqueenly reblogged this from neverwillstop
    28. becausechriscolferthatswhy reblogged this from misandristscum